• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Stop struggling with Lightroom! There's no need to spend hours hunting for the answers to your Lightroom Classic questions. All the information you need is in Adobe Lightroom Classic - The Missing FAQ!

    To help you get started, there's a series of easy tutorials to guide you through a simple workflow. As you grow in confidence, the book switches to a conversational FAQ format, so you can quickly find answers to advanced questions. And better still, the eBooks are updated for every release, so it's always up to date.
  • 25 June 2024 It's Lightroom update time again! See What’s New in Lightroom Classic 13.4, Mobile & Desktop (June 2024)? for the bug fixes and new lens profiles. Warning... this is a minor dot release and does NOT fix some of the bugs introduced in 13.3, so if you reverted to 13.2 due to bugs (e.g. sync issues), we'd suggest you stay there for now.

What is ccxprocess and why did it just get added to my login items

Not open for further replies.

Don Goldberg

New Member
Sep 19, 2016
Lightroom Experience
Lightroom Version
Lightroom Version Number
Operating System
  1. macOS 13 Ventura
I'm using MacOS (latest version (13.3.1). Today I got q notification that a new app CCXPROCESS has been aded to my login items. The app file is in the Adobe Creative Cloud area of the App;ications>Utilities folder. Worryingly, the login item listing says this is from an "Unknown Developer,"

I've been using Lightroom for ages and have never seen this before. I have Lightroom Classic, Lightroom and Photoshop installed.

Does anyone know what is going on here?
I stand corrected, his condescension was not particularly rude.

Please......there was nothing rude or condescending in Hal's reply, and it's a pity that you thought it was.

I'll be locking the thread, the question was answered, so further discussion is pointless.
Not open for further replies.