Workflow help

  • Thread starter Thread starter trubluphoto
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

trubluphoto

Guest
I have a question about effective workflow. . .
As I import images into lightroom, is it better to label each job as a catalog and have collections within each catalog or is it better to label the entire job as a collection and flag/star color code within the collection?
Also, can someone explain how folders work to me. I noticed when I try to open a new folder in Lightroom, it also creates a new folder on my hard drive. Why is this?
 
There are different opinions on how many catalogs to maintain. I strongly am in favor of only having one catalog — unless you have completely non-overlapping groups of photos (for example, business and personal).

The primary reason for my opinion is that there is no way to search across catalogs. If you have a great photo in catalog1 with the keyword Architecture; and another great photo in catalog2 with the same keyword, there are no search functions that will find them both. If everything is in one catalog, then the problem is gone.

Folders in Lightroom are identical to folders on your hard drive. There is no difference. Any time you create/move/rename a folder or move/rename/delete a photo within Lightroom, the identical changes are made to your hard drive.
 
[quote author=trubluphoto link=topic=7292.msg49651#msg49651 date=1248183917]
I have a question about effective workflow. . .
As I import images into lightroom, is it better to label each job as a catalog and have collections within each catalog or is it better to label the entire job as a collection and flag/star color code within the collection?
Also, can someone explain how folders work to me. I noticed when I try to open a new folder in Lightroom, it also creates a new folder on my hard drive. Why is this?
[/quote]I agree with Paige, one catalog is sufficient. Unless you have a business rule that requires segregation, there should be no compelling reason to keep more than one catalog.

If you take the lightroom suggested import folder structure, it will import each import into date named folders on your HD. While you do not need to follow this suggestion, it is usually sufficient to help you use your brain catalog to quickly begin to locate a set of photos. The proper use of Keywords is essential to good organization. It will pay in the long run to research some of the keyword organizations and implement this early in your LR catalog process.

Lightroom does not care where you store the physical images as long as it can build a pointer to those images. You can with keywords quickly group these images however you like today and another way tomorrow. If you import your images in date designated dolders and have a photo session that covers several days, then setting up a special collection will help you manage those photos as a set even though physically, they may span several folders in the HD directry structure.

You should also make use of the Smart Collection filter process to create living, growing collections that are dynamic and will change as you add new photos and change or remove old ones from the catalog.
 
Great, thanks for the feedback. If one catalog is the best way to go, what do you to when lightroom starts to slow down a bit due to a large catalog? My latest catalog has 15,''' photos in it and I've really noticed a difference in the speed of which I can edit and work with my images. Is there a solution to this problem?
 
[quote author=trubluphoto link=topic=7292.msg49655#msg49655 date=1248187462]
Great, thanks for the feedback. If one catalog is the best way to go, what do you to when lightroom starts to slow down a bit due to a large catalog? My latest catalog has 15,''' photos in it and I've really noticed a difference in the speed of which I can edit and work with my images. Is there a solution to this problem?

[/quote]You should 'Optimise' your catalog when the catalog gets sluggish <Catalog Preferences><General>...
If you are pulling lots of images into the viewer or Develop module, then these can make performance sluggish. If your image files are fragmented on the HD (shouldn't be a problem with a Mac right?) then these can hamper performance. Being limited to 2 GB RAM will also take a bite out of performance.
If your images are located on a remote drive (Network or USB) they will take longer to be retrieved and loaded into that 2GB RAM that you have. If you are creating sidecar XMP files then this is an extra R/W for each edit change.
In summary, the catalog database is probably the most efficient part of the workflow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top