Smart Collections don't work?
I have several smart collections set up with a specific criteria, but it appears that it only works when it wants to. Here's what I'm trying to do.
I have some photos that have keywords "sb X" or "sb Y". Then I have some that are "pb X" or "pb Y", where the X and Y are different names. Sometimes sb and pb are the same name All of the pb photos have different colors in the keywords.
So, I have a smart collection that has these criteria:
Contains all keywords pb X
Contains keywords palomino
I would assume that only the photos that are pb X, not pb Y, sb X or sb Y, should show up in the smart collection, right? Well, that's not happening. I'm getting photos that are sb X, not pb X. What am I doing wrong? I have several other smart collections with the exact same criteria (except for different colors) and they do work, so maybe this has happened after the update to 2.5?
I also tried using + between the words, before and after the words, etc., to no avail.
Also, does "contains all" equal "contains only"? I think that's the criteria I'm really looking for.
I have several smart collections set up with a specific criteria, but it appears that it only works when it wants to. Here's what I'm trying to do.
I have some photos that have keywords "sb X" or "sb Y". Then I have some that are "pb X" or "pb Y", where the X and Y are different names. Sometimes sb and pb are the same name All of the pb photos have different colors in the keywords.
So, I have a smart collection that has these criteria:
Contains all keywords pb X
Contains keywords palomino
I would assume that only the photos that are pb X, not pb Y, sb X or sb Y, should show up in the smart collection, right? Well, that's not happening. I'm getting photos that are sb X, not pb X. What am I doing wrong? I have several other smart collections with the exact same criteria (except for different colors) and they do work, so maybe this has happened after the update to 2.5?
I also tried using + between the words, before and after the words, etc., to no avail.
Also, does "contains all" equal "contains only"? I think that's the criteria I'm really looking for.
