B
BostonRott
Guest
Hi all,
This looks like a forum full of great info and helpful people! Thanks to Kiwi Geoff for leading me here. :cheesy::cheesy:
I am currently a PS CS3 user (Windows, XP). I am in year 2 of "picture a day" project, so I have lots of photos and lots of folders. My current naming structure is a folder named MMMYY, and then within that, daily folders named DDMMYY. For instance, I have Feb'9, and within that, '2'1'9, '2'2'9, etc.
In reading through Kelby's book and seeing the defaults for LR's import naming conventions, I think that YYYY/month/dd will fit my needs best. I have loaded LR to the computer but not yet imported anything to the catalog, b/c I want to be sure of how things will settle once I ask the computer to stir it all up.
So......I went back and created a 2''8 folder, and a 2''9 folder. Everything older than that is already off the PC due to size constraints.
Will LR create its own new folders of 2''8/month/dd and 2''9/month/dd or will it accept what is already present and just proceed forward? I shoot in RAW with a 12MP camera, so my files are not small and I'd really prefer not to have duplicates (or try to clean up a big mess of "what Bridge did" and "what LR did"). My intent is to get current stuff (on my PC and the external HD's) loaded into LR, and then proceed forward with only using LR to import photos, and hopefully not have to deal with Bridge anymore (hooray!).
I'm very excited by the power I see in LR's database (my main reason for purchasing it), especially the ability to remember what's on my off-line external HD's.

Thanks in advance for your help!
This looks like a forum full of great info and helpful people! Thanks to Kiwi Geoff for leading me here. :cheesy::cheesy:
I am currently a PS CS3 user (Windows, XP). I am in year 2 of "picture a day" project, so I have lots of photos and lots of folders. My current naming structure is a folder named MMMYY, and then within that, daily folders named DDMMYY. For instance, I have Feb'9, and within that, '2'1'9, '2'2'9, etc.
In reading through Kelby's book and seeing the defaults for LR's import naming conventions, I think that YYYY/month/dd will fit my needs best. I have loaded LR to the computer but not yet imported anything to the catalog, b/c I want to be sure of how things will settle once I ask the computer to stir it all up.
So......I went back and created a 2''8 folder, and a 2''9 folder. Everything older than that is already off the PC due to size constraints.
Will LR create its own new folders of 2''8/month/dd and 2''9/month/dd or will it accept what is already present and just proceed forward? I shoot in RAW with a 12MP camera, so my files are not small and I'd really prefer not to have duplicates (or try to clean up a big mess of "what Bridge did" and "what LR did"). My intent is to get current stuff (on my PC and the external HD's) loaded into LR, and then proceed forward with only using LR to import photos, and hopefully not have to deal with Bridge anymore (hooray!).
I'm very excited by the power I see in LR's database (my main reason for purchasing it), especially the ability to remember what's on my off-line external HD's.
Thanks in advance for your help!
