- Joined
- Dec 7, 2007
- Messages
- 3,069
- Location
- Puget Sound
- Lightroom Experience
- Intermediate
- Lightroom Version
- Classic
This is not going to be your standard question relating to a new dream system. Presently, my main computer, listed in my signature below, has 2GB of RAM and a Pentium M 1.73GHz processor. Its not the fastest rig, but it gets me by with respect to LR. Now, I may be giving up my laptop to my beloved, and I have several budget options for consideration. First, I have a Dell Dimension 3''' desktop that has a Pentium 4 3.'GHz with 512 MB of memory. This processor is supposed to be mildly faster than the Pentium M above, and I can easily upgrade to 2GB of memory.
I am also considering an HP Mini 1''' with an Atom processor because it may meet some travel needs. This is supposed to be a bit slower than the Pentium M above, and I would consider this a secondary machine to a desktop, like the Dimension 3''' above.
So, keeping in mind where I am presently at, I have two questions that I would like to pose. First, does anybody have some kind of idea as to how much of a speed change, positive or negative, these two alternate machines would pose under "normal" LR tasks in relation to my current machine. the benchmark scores that I have seen do not seem to help me very much.
Second, would a new low- to mid-range Core 2 Duo (or Pentium Dual E2XXX series) based machine seem to be significantly faster than my current machine? They say ignorance is bliss, and while I am not quite blissful, I am somewhat contented becaused I do not have to sit in front of LR all day long. (For comparison purposes, my machine at work is a Core 2 Duo with 2GB of RAM, and it does not seem that much faster with respect to MS Office applications.)
In light of the economic situation many of us are facing, I really do not want to shell out a large sum of money for a high end machine when LR is the only taxing program that I use with any frequency. However, there are a large number of refurbished machines that are much better equipped than my Dimension 3''' and you would think that they would offer significant performance gains. I could use that money for the additional Dimension 3''' RAM and put it towards one of these "semi-disposable" CPU's, but if the gain is minimal, its not that great a use of funds.
Any comments or advice would be greatly appreciated.
--Ken
I am also considering an HP Mini 1''' with an Atom processor because it may meet some travel needs. This is supposed to be a bit slower than the Pentium M above, and I would consider this a secondary machine to a desktop, like the Dimension 3''' above.
So, keeping in mind where I am presently at, I have two questions that I would like to pose. First, does anybody have some kind of idea as to how much of a speed change, positive or negative, these two alternate machines would pose under "normal" LR tasks in relation to my current machine. the benchmark scores that I have seen do not seem to help me very much.
Second, would a new low- to mid-range Core 2 Duo (or Pentium Dual E2XXX series) based machine seem to be significantly faster than my current machine? They say ignorance is bliss, and while I am not quite blissful, I am somewhat contented becaused I do not have to sit in front of LR all day long. (For comparison purposes, my machine at work is a Core 2 Duo with 2GB of RAM, and it does not seem that much faster with respect to MS Office applications.)
In light of the economic situation many of us are facing, I really do not want to shell out a large sum of money for a high end machine when LR is the only taxing program that I use with any frequency. However, there are a large number of refurbished machines that are much better equipped than my Dimension 3''' and you would think that they would offer significant performance gains. I could use that money for the additional Dimension 3''' RAM and put it towards one of these "semi-disposable" CPU's, but if the gain is minimal, its not that great a use of funds.
Any comments or advice would be greatly appreciated.
--Ken