• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • The May 2019 Lightroom updates are now available. There's a brand new slider called Texture, available across the whole family of apps. Lightroom Classic includes a new tool called Flat Field Correction. Lightroom (cloud-based service) has lots of big improvements including cloud trash, invitation-only web galleries, improved chromatic aberration removal and more. The Missing FAQ and Edit Like a Pro eBooks are already updated for the changes. You'll also notice the CC's have disappeared off the end of the names, so we've updated the forum names to match.

Map module & Location

ColMac9090

Active Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
156
Location
Edinburgh, Scotland
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
Lightroom Version
Lightroom Classic version: 8.3.1
Operating System
Windows 10
Has the map module changed how it works.

I've just manually added locations for a batch of photos, entering Sandylands as the location. I then placed 36 of these images on the map module by dragging them and placing them where they were shot.

On returning to the Library view with the location filter on , I spotted that the location for these 36 photos had been changed in the filter to Saltcoats, but the Metadata panel still showed the manually entered value of Saandylands.

lrq.jpg


In fact, all 36 images now appear as Saltcoats in the filter, but Sandylands in the metadata panel.

The location is in fact doubtful, as there is a border between these towns very close by, but why is the Map module overwriting the manually entered value, and why is it not appearing in the metadata panel?

I did expand the metadata panel to show "all possible items" and I did not spot Saltcoats as appearing anywhere.

Incidentally, if I drag the images to a slightly different spot on the map, they revert to Sandylands.


Colin
 
Last edited:

SaraLH

New Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2019
Messages
20
Location
Germany
Lightroom Experience
Advanced
Lightroom Version
Classic 8
Hi Colin,
it sounds like you have the "Address Lookup" checked in the metadata panel of the catalog settings. If you uncheck this LR will stop writing location information for you. I have it unchecked because I use Jeffrey Friedl's Geolocation plugin.
1560427270036.png
 

ColMac9090

Active Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
156
Location
Edinburgh, Scotland
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
HI Sarah,

You are right. I have checked and that setting is set. I'm away to play with this and see if that resolves the problem.

I'll also have a look at that plug in. I have a couple of his, but not that one

Thanks for your input.

Colin
 

ColMac9090

Active Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
156
Location
Edinburgh, Scotland
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
Hi Sarah

Unfortunately, that setting makes no difference.

Colin
 

ColMac9090

Active Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
156
Location
Edinburgh, Scotland
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
The problem seems even stranger.

I start with a different folder. There are 106 images in this folder. Each has no GPS data, each has sublocation set to "Beach", and City to "Ardrossan".

lrq 2.jpg

I then manually drag 25 images (all at once) on the map module to 1 location, and 81 (again all at once) to another nearby location.

lrq 3.jpg

On returning to the library module my filter panel

lrq 4.jpg


Now has 20 at one location, 15 at another, and 71 as unknown. No relation to the 25/81 split on the map. All Sublocations on the metadata panel still show "Beach".

Colin
 
Top