Making my changes permanent

Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
1
Lightroom Experience
Beginner
Lightroom Version
Classic 7
#26
It's been an interesting exchange here. Despite best practice being to preserve the original, I'm very much in favor of an *option* to have edits applied (destructively), but preserving other catalog information. "Best practice" should be used in most cases, but not when there is a good reason not too. As a semi-beginner non-professional I do use Lightroom non-destructively but sometimes use Photoshop destructively.
 

JohanElzenga

Lightroom Guru
Staff member
Moderator
Lightroom Guru
Joined
Jul 2, 2015
Messages
7,278
Location
Netherlands
Lightroom Experience
Power User
Lightroom Version
Classic 7
#27

clee01l

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator
Lightroom Guru
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
13,771
Location
Bellaire, TX USA
Lightroom Experience
Power User
Lightroom Version
Classic 7
#28
Sometimes it is in the best interest of all to protect the stupid from themselves. Any time you write over the original, that original is irretreivably lost. If you have ever pressed the wrong key or later exclaimed "Oops!" you can get a grasp of what irretreivably lost means. The worst example is the JPEG. Which is a lossy format. Even the 1st generation JPEG from the camera never returns all of the pixels contained in the original file before it was saved. If you overwrite the lossy original with a new derivative file it loses even more pixels and further edits and saves destroy even more pixels resulting in eventually an unusable image file. As a semi-beginner, you simply have not gained enough photo file knowledge to see what a bad decision it would be to write over the original.

I have JPEGs that were taken 20 years ago and processed using a destructive editor. They are not much good to me today since the processing was so rank amateur and the processing app so technically abysmal that my faded memory of the event has more use to me that any image retained.
 
Last edited:

cyrc

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
1
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
6.x / CC 2015.x
#29
Thanks to all for your time and suggestions. I'll do some more research and develop my workflow hopefully avoiding doing anything I'll regret further down the line.

Back to studying the Missing FAQ book!

Dave
Did you ever settle on how to accomplish your goals? I am doing the same kind of thing -scanning old photos going back over 80 years, the bulk of which are in horrible shape, and trying to make them better. I am also tagging people and changing capture dates to match when I believe the photo was taken as opposed to the time of the scan. It is a lot of work and I want these changes to be permanent, especially the new capture date. It is too easy to revert the capture date to the date of the scan because the revert and the edit commands are right next to each other on the menu list. I mistakenly reverted dates an entire folders and lost weeks worth of dating where I had pored over the details of each photo one by one to settle on a best guess as to the time it was taken.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
919
Location
Hong Kong
Lightroom Experience
Advanced
Lightroom Version
Classic 7
#30
It has been so long since I made the transition from photoshop to lightroom that my memory of how strange a concept lightroom was is now a distant memory. One of those strange concepts was the fact that you didn't open a photo file, edit it and then save it. In lightroom you imported it into a catalogue, edited it and that was it, you didn't save anything and so it did feel incomplete at first. Also in those early days in lightroom because of unfamiliarity there was much greater scope for disasters such as having thousands of photos selected and applying edits to what you thought was 1 photo ! If you caught it before closing lightroom then Ctrl + Z was there to save the day but if you didn't then ........

Now after may years of using lightroom it is of course second nature and doesn't feel strange at all. When I have done with editing etc. I feel as if those edits are permanent, even though of course I can further edit and change. However, if you really want a permanent version you can always export to create a new file in whatever format you like.

In my view having a feature that makes edits "permanent" would defeat one of the fundamental principles of lightroom. In any case, due to the nature of lightroom such a feature would have to be unlockable thereby rendering it not permanent.
 

Jimmsp

Active Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
872
Location
Green Valley, Arizona, USA
Lightroom Experience
Advanced
Lightroom Version
Classic 7
#31
Having moved to shooting only Raw a number (>15) of years ago, I have come to appreciate many of the arguments discussed above.
But I have also come to learn that little in photography is ever "permanent", except perhaps the raw negative.
I have grown as a photographer over the years, Lightroom has grown as a processing package over the same time frame, and what I think of as "good processing" has changed a bit as well.
I sometimes go back a few years and relook at a photo I once had given a 5* rating to - meaning one of my best.
I resurrect the Raw - unchanged - make a virtual copy, and reprocess it. Most of the time when I am done, it looks different than what I had first did.
Sometimes the changes are small, other times not.
Is this bad? No. But if I had tossed the Raw negative, I would be missing something important.
I have a few scans of both prints and of negatives. Again, the same. I can go back to the original scans, call them my Raw, and reprocess.
Once again, I am happy to have the original, and to be able to compare my version 1 with a version 2 done a few years later.
Some of these new processed photos also include (destructive) enhancements in Photoshop. But keeping the original unchanged Raw is vital to me.
Good luck in your journey.
 

PhilBurton

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
1,311
Location
California, USA
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
Classic 7
#32
Did you ever settle on how to accomplish your goals? I am doing the same kind of thing -scanning old photos going back over 80 years, the bulk of which are in horrible shape, and trying to make them better. I am also tagging people and changing capture dates to match when I believe the photo was taken as opposed to the time of the scan. It is a lot of work and I want these changes to be permanent, especially the new capture date. It is too easy to revert the capture date to the date of the scan because the revert and the edit commands are right next to each other on the menu list. I mistakenly reverted dates an entire folders and lost weeks worth of dating where I had pored over the details of each photo one by one to settle on a best guess as to the time it was taken.
cyrc (and Cheshire4Dave)

How do you handle the situation where only the year of the photo is known? Or maybe only a range of years?

Phil Burton
 

Roelof Moorlag

Active Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
882
Location
Netherlands
Lightroom Experience
Power User
Lightroom Version
Classic 7
#33
Top