- Joined
- Apr 30, 2014
- Messages
- 6
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Lightroom Experience
- Intermediate
- Lightroom Version
Hi All.
I am hoping someone may have experienced this issue and can point me in the right direction.
I use LR CC on a MacBook Pro with an Epson P600 printer.
Like many photographic clubs, my local club has a size restriction on prints being submitted for competitions. I like to maximise the size of the prints I submit (within the restrictions) and keep my mat margins to 60mm. This means I need to be reasonably accurate with the size of the printed area, allowing 2-3mm overlap with the mat on each edge.
Within the Print module LR allows you to set the cell size, and I use that as a means of creating a print of the size I need to meet my needs.
Today I printed one print (portrait orientation, A3+ Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Ultra Smooth 305 GSM, front fed) and it printed exactly the right size. Happy camper!
I then used the same sizing technique and printed a second print (same set-up, same 100% scaling, same paper, same profile, same user pre-set, same page set-up... you get the picture!) except it was a different photo with a landscape orientation.
Bad news - Both the long (horizontal) edge and the short (vertical) edge were scaled up by a little over 3% - which put my horizontal out by 10mm. Now that doesn't sound much, but as I said I am working with fine parameters. Also, I recently printed out a large landscape print on roll paper and when I tried to use my pre-cut mat with it, the print was at least 20mm too large... I had to get the mat professionally re-cut which was costly. I am now thinking it was the same issue although I thought I measured it wrong the first time.
Now, I don't know if this has anything to do with portrait versus landscape, or something else, but the idea of doing a quick draft print on cheap paper to check the dimensions every time I need to print is going to drive me mad, not too mention waste ink of not good paper.
Anyone else had this experience? Any ideas / fixes? Or do I just alter my expectations around the accuracy of this stuff?
Appreciate any help. Cheers!
PS - At one stage I was going to get smart and just reduce the cell size in LR by around 3% thinking I would just out-smart whatever the issue is - that was until the portrait photo worked out exactly. If it is a ratio/landscape thing, I wonder what the magic ratio is that the scaling starts kicking in? Something tells me that's a road that's going nowhere near the real solution.
I am hoping someone may have experienced this issue and can point me in the right direction.
I use LR CC on a MacBook Pro with an Epson P600 printer.
Like many photographic clubs, my local club has a size restriction on prints being submitted for competitions. I like to maximise the size of the prints I submit (within the restrictions) and keep my mat margins to 60mm. This means I need to be reasonably accurate with the size of the printed area, allowing 2-3mm overlap with the mat on each edge.
Within the Print module LR allows you to set the cell size, and I use that as a means of creating a print of the size I need to meet my needs.
Today I printed one print (portrait orientation, A3+ Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Ultra Smooth 305 GSM, front fed) and it printed exactly the right size. Happy camper!
I then used the same sizing technique and printed a second print (same set-up, same 100% scaling, same paper, same profile, same user pre-set, same page set-up... you get the picture!) except it was a different photo with a landscape orientation.
Bad news - Both the long (horizontal) edge and the short (vertical) edge were scaled up by a little over 3% - which put my horizontal out by 10mm. Now that doesn't sound much, but as I said I am working with fine parameters. Also, I recently printed out a large landscape print on roll paper and when I tried to use my pre-cut mat with it, the print was at least 20mm too large... I had to get the mat professionally re-cut which was costly. I am now thinking it was the same issue although I thought I measured it wrong the first time.
Now, I don't know if this has anything to do with portrait versus landscape, or something else, but the idea of doing a quick draft print on cheap paper to check the dimensions every time I need to print is going to drive me mad, not too mention waste ink of not good paper.
Anyone else had this experience? Any ideas / fixes? Or do I just alter my expectations around the accuracy of this stuff?
Appreciate any help. Cheers!
PS - At one stage I was going to get smart and just reduce the cell size in LR by around 3% thinking I would just out-smart whatever the issue is - that was until the portrait photo worked out exactly. If it is a ratio/landscape thing, I wonder what the magic ratio is that the scaling starts kicking in? Something tells me that's a road that's going nowhere near the real solution.