- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 3,472
- Location
- Palo Alto, California, USA
- Lightroom Experience
- Intermediate
- Lightroom Version
- Classic
- Lightroom Version Number
- Classic 13.2
- Operating System
- Windows 10
I'm aware of the long-standing bug that limits keyword display to about 1500 or 2000 items. A workaround seems to be to use nested keywords. I'm concerned that the total size of all keywords as a text string could also be limited, either in the keyword part of the catalog or on export. So before I go down this rabbit hole, I need some advice.
I'm planning to add keywords for photos for my hobby, railroads. I need to create keywords to capture rail subject-specific informationn. (Once I thought that custom metadata would be the best way to input rail subject-specif information, but it's clear that XMP custom metadata seems to have zero industry adoption.)
One important keyword n is the name of the railroad system, e..g. Union Pacific Railroad or British Rail. Ideally, I would have a separate keyword for each system, e.g.
SystemName-Union-Pacific-Railroad or SystemName-British-Rail. Between the US and Europe, I could easily imagine 125 systems, including national/regional systems and urban metro systems,, some with very long names, e.g. Societé Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français. Could I run into a size issue here?
I can see two modifications to this approach that might reduce total text size:
1. Use just initials., e.g. UPRR or BR or SNCF.
2. I would rathernot use just the SystemNames keyword with a separate keyword for each system name. This approach would have the disadvantage of separating the actual system name from the SystemName keyword.
Phil Burton
I'm planning to add keywords for photos for my hobby, railroads. I need to create keywords to capture rail subject-specific informationn. (Once I thought that custom metadata would be the best way to input rail subject-specif information, but it's clear that XMP custom metadata seems to have zero industry adoption.)
One important keyword n is the name of the railroad system, e..g. Union Pacific Railroad or British Rail. Ideally, I would have a separate keyword for each system, e.g.
SystemName-Union-Pacific-Railroad or SystemName-British-Rail. Between the US and Europe, I could easily imagine 125 systems, including national/regional systems and urban metro systems,, some with very long names, e.g. Societé Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français. Could I run into a size issue here?
I can see two modifications to this approach that might reduce total text size:
1. Use just initials., e.g. UPRR or BR or SNCF.
2. I would rathernot use just the SystemNames keyword with a separate keyword for each system name. This approach would have the disadvantage of separating the actual system name from the SystemName keyword.
Phil Burton