- Joined
- Nov 23, 2008
- Messages
- 44
- Lightroom Version
- 11.4
- Operating System
- Windows 10
Greetings. I am a big LR Queen fan and also LR Classic...have used since inception. And recommend both to people that ask my opinion.
However I am disappointed at the huge image search feature gap between the AI driven Samsung Gallery android app and LR Classic. They have continued to improve and now with its most recent release it is incredible. Many are aware of Google Photos server-based search of photos in the Google cloud. I am not talking about that. And I know the LR cloud version has better search capabilities as it has the same benefits Google photo has (the images are in their cloud and they can use their servers for search). That is apples and oranges. We take this for granted for images we take with our camera phone that are backed up in the cloud.
But I am talking about a phone CPU-based local search of internal memory and a microSD card that contains most of my photo library as JPEGs. I export my library from LRC as JPEGs and save on a large microSD in my phone. It actually only takes up a small percent of space but is 10's of thousands of images.
I know LRC has a rudimentary people search....and if you tag EVERY image search works....and I tag and use collections quite a bit....but with gallery without any tags.... I can search on cats, airplanes, a color, and of course people. And it searches all folders anywhere on my phone. Can find mountains, sunset, tractor..... I think my desktop CPU has the horsepower if my phone does.
In fact, if I am looking for a photo from the distant past I can't find via tags or collections, I will search my photo library on my phone, find the filename and then search for the filename in LRC! That just shouldn't be necessary
Considering what we pay for LRC IMHO the search capabilities need a huge upgrade to current standards and other free apps. Now perhaps that is in the works....I certainly hope so.
Thanks,
BJB
However I am disappointed at the huge image search feature gap between the AI driven Samsung Gallery android app and LR Classic. They have continued to improve and now with its most recent release it is incredible. Many are aware of Google Photos server-based search of photos in the Google cloud. I am not talking about that. And I know the LR cloud version has better search capabilities as it has the same benefits Google photo has (the images are in their cloud and they can use their servers for search). That is apples and oranges. We take this for granted for images we take with our camera phone that are backed up in the cloud.
But I am talking about a phone CPU-based local search of internal memory and a microSD card that contains most of my photo library as JPEGs. I export my library from LRC as JPEGs and save on a large microSD in my phone. It actually only takes up a small percent of space but is 10's of thousands of images.
I know LRC has a rudimentary people search....and if you tag EVERY image search works....and I tag and use collections quite a bit....but with gallery without any tags.... I can search on cats, airplanes, a color, and of course people. And it searches all folders anywhere on my phone. Can find mountains, sunset, tractor..... I think my desktop CPU has the horsepower if my phone does.
In fact, if I am looking for a photo from the distant past I can't find via tags or collections, I will search my photo library on my phone, find the filename and then search for the filename in LRC! That just shouldn't be necessary
Considering what we pay for LRC IMHO the search capabilities need a huge upgrade to current standards and other free apps. Now perhaps that is in the works....I certainly hope so.
Thanks,
BJB