• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Stop struggling with Lightroom! There's no need to spend hours hunting for the answers to your Lightroom Classic questions. All the information you need is in Adobe Lightroom Classic - The Missing FAQ!

    To help you get started, there's a series of easy tutorials to guide you through a simple workflow. As you grow in confidence, the book switches to a conversational FAQ format, so you can quickly find answers to advanced questions. And better still, the eBooks are updated for every release, so it's always up to date.

JPG to DNG

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CatherineA

New Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2018
Messages
6
Lightroom Experience
Beginner
Lightroom Version
Lightroom Version Number
Lightroom Classic 7.3.1
Operating System
  1. macOS 10.13 High Sierra
I'm new to photography, new to LR and new to this forum so here goes with a very basic question. My camera only shoots JPG images and I wonder whether it matters whether I choose to Copy As DNG or just Copy. I now know that DNG is designed for RAW files but in my case, with JPG, what would the difference be in what is stored with the two ways of copying files?

I am trying to get better organized in my approach now, but I have imported both ways and I wonder what the consequences are.

Thank you!
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
Just use Copy. Copy as DNG would only put your JPEG's in another envelope.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thank you Johan. I will switch to doing this from now on. Have I lost info or data on the images where I selected “Copy as DNG”?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
JohanElzenga said:
No, like I said, you simply placed it in another envelope.
Click to expand...
And, just to be clear to the OP, you have not gained a heck of a lot either...
You have put put 8-bit data into an envelope that can contain 16-bit data, but the end result is still 8-bit data and all its limitations...

Just saying...

Tony Jay
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I agree with earlier comments. Once something has been processed and compressed from a RAW file of any kind (which is what happened in the camera), there is no advantage to turning the file into a DNG because you can't make the kinds of changes you can do with any RAW file.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The one advantage of converting to DNG is that the DNG format contains a checksum validation feature, so you can verify that the files aren't becoming corrupted somehow.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
marcb said:
The one advantage of converting to DNG is that the DNG format contains a checksum validation feature, so you can verify that the files aren't becoming corrupted somehow.
Click to expand...
True, but that function is pretty overrated. Validation does not protect you against corruption, it's just an early warning (if you are disciplined enough to run it regularly). An 'early warning' may sound like an advantage (in case of cancer, or a fire, an early warning can save life), but it isn't really. File corruption isn't like cancer or like a fire. It doesn't spread and the remedy is the same whether or not you detect it early or late: replace the image by a backup image. Maybe I have one or two corrupted images in my archive, who knows. But as long as I don't need them, that doesn't matter. And when I do need them for something, I'll know they are corrupted. With or without validation.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
True, but I would rather have an early warning, so I can recover the last good version from my backups before they rotate...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
marcb said:
True, but I would rather have an early warning, so I can recover the last good version from my backups before they rotate...
Click to expand...
It's very unlikely that file corruption would trigger your backup system into making a new backup copy.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
JohanElzenga said:
It's very unlikely that file corruption would trigger your backup system into making a new backup copy.
Click to expand...
Fortunately, I've never had to resort to my backups yet. Another big advantage of LR's non-destructive approach :).
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The beauty of importing JPEG originals as DNGs is that it greatly reduces the risk of overwriting the files by editing them in Photoshop. Lightroom edits can also be safely saved back to these DNGs, allowing other applications to see the image's LR-adjusted appearance.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
johnbeardy said:
The beauty of importing JPEG originals as DNGs is that it greatly reduces the risk of overwriting the files by editing them in Photoshop. Lightroom edits can also be safely saved back to these DNGs, allowing other applications to see the image's LR-adjusted appearance.
Click to expand...

That does sound like a potential advantage. I will need to be further along the learning curve to know how to protect files this way. I’ve only used Photoshop for a few minutes but stilll managed to overwrite and lose two images. I had selected Copy, I think, when I imported those two photos. Won’t go back on PS until I understand a bit more!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
When you send a non-raw (raw or dng) image like a JPEG from LR, LR asks if you want to edit the original. Of course, you don't need to choose that option. But if you do opt to edit the original, that's what PS opens. Potentially, you can then overwrite the original.

Just play with some test images and see what damage you can do ;)

John
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
johnbeardy said:
When you send a non-raw (raw or dng) image like a JPEG from LR, LR asks if you want to edit the original. Of course, you don't need to choose that option. But if you do opt to edit the original, that's what PS opens. Potentially, you can then overwrite the original.

Just play with some test images and see what damage you can do ;)

John
Click to expand...

Thanks very much! I guess there are so many things on my screen that I don’t get and just ignore that I ignored that very important question from LR too
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
CatherineA said:
choose to Copy As DNG or just Copy. I now know that DNG is designed for RAW files but in my case, with JPG, what would the difference be in what is stored with the two ways of copying files?
Click to expand...

It's a moot point. Copy as DNG only converts raw files to DNG and does a normal copy for other file types. There are ways of wrapping JPEGs in a DNG wrapper, but not through LR's import dialog.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
CatherineA said:
I now know that DNG is designed for RAW files but in my case, with JPG, what would the difference be in what is stored with the two ways of copying files?
Click to expand...
It might be fair to point out that DNG is a file specification that describes the data in the data block. The data block does not have to be RAW data. I believe that writing a DNG file out from a JPEG source will simple copy the JPEG data block to the DNG data block. The header block (container as referenced by others) will contain the metadata translated from the JPEG header block into the DNG header block
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
clee01l said:
It might be fair to point out that DNG is a file specification that describes the data in the data block. The data block does not have to be RAW data. I believe that writing a DNG file out from a JPEG source will simple copy the JPEG data block to the DNG data block. The header block (container as referenced by others) will contain the metadata translated from the JPEG header block into the DNG header block
Click to expand...

Thank you for this information
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top