It would be great if we were able to manage the job queue a little more. I just set off 1' separate exports - the first time I have done this - I was hoping the jobs would queue behind each other, but it tries to do all 1' at the same time, and fails to export some images as a result as the machine is getting hammered. The reason I did it as 1' jobs is that I needed different naming for each.
It would be great on an export if we had the choice to either, queue the export job to run after the currently running one (sequentially), or run it alongside the existing jobs (in parallel). Would put a lot less load on the processor and disk if run in sequence!
Thanks,
Paul
It would be great on an export if we had the choice to either, queue the export job to run after the currently running one (sequentially), or run it alongside the existing jobs (in parallel). Would put a lot less load on the processor and disk if run in sequence!
Thanks,
Paul
