• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Stop struggling with Lightroom! There's no need to spend hours hunting for the answers to your Lightroom 6 questions. All the information you need is in Adobe Lightroom 6 - The Missing FAQ!

    To help you get started, there's a series of easy tutorials to guide you through a simple workflow. As you grow in confidence, the book switches to a conversational FAQ format, so you can quickly find answers to advanced questions. When you upgrade to subscription, there's also a Lightroom Classic version available.
  • It's Lightroom update time again! Color Grading and improved zoom across the whole Lightroom family, plus graphical watermarks for the cloud-based Lightroom apps, as well as the usual new cameras, lens profiles and bug fixes. See this blog post for Lightroom Classic and this blog post for the Lightroom Cloud Ecosystem changes.

Importing RAW + JPEG, but only RAWS visible in LR

ralfraz

New Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
5
Location
upstate NY
I habitually shoot both RAW & JPEG, and import both into LR. Since I switched to LR CC, I am unable to see the JPEGs. Instead, the twin images show up in grid view as a single tile labeled “RAF + JPEG”. At first I thought it was an auto-stack, but I’m unable to unstack. When I go to the develop module, it indicates that I am working with the raw file. When I try to sort the grid by file type, none of the twin JPEGs are sorted or visible.

In prior versions of LR, the two files showed up as separate tiles in grid view, and I could sort them and open them independently. In CC, all my twinned RAW + JPEG images show up as a single tile and I’m unable to view or process the JPEGs at all. Baffled. Any suggestions would be welcome. Thanks.

Mark
 
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
3,315
Location
Canada
Lightroom Experience
Advanced
Lightroom Version
On the General tab of the Preferences dialogue, there's a checkbox "Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate photos". You'll need to tick that box.

That will cause all future imports to catalogue all the raw files and their JPG counterparts. The imports that didn't bring in the JPEGs won't be affected, but you can Synchronize the affected folders which will then bring in the JPEGs.
 

Doug_E

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
2
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
I have an issue similar to ralfraz: I save both CR2 and JPG versions of my photos, but after I import them into Lightroom I want to unstack the two versions just for selected photos. I prefer to continue to import the files as one, rather than having all future photos unstacked. Is it possible to unstack just selected photos? When I select a CR2+JPG stacked photo, most of the stack manipulation options, including "Unstack" and "Remove from Stack" are grayed out.
 
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
3,315
Location
Canada
Lightroom Experience
Advanced
Lightroom Version
Doug,
Welcome to the forum.

They aren't stacked. The jpeg isn't imported, but LR knows to move it to another folder if you move the raw file.

You could change the preference to tell LR to import JPEGs next to raws and synchronize the folder that contains the jpegs you want in LR. In the Import window that comes up, uncheck all the JPEGs you don't want and then do the synchronize. That will bring those JPEGs in. Then you'll need to remember to change your preferences back.
 

Doug_E

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
2
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
Thanks! I was unaware that Lightroom didn't import the JPEGs so that explains what I was seeing. My motivation in wanting to see the two formats separately was so I could delete one or the other (to save disk space) depending on whether I wanted to edit the photo (use the CR2) or quickly share it with family (JPEG). Your suggestion will enable me to do that.
 

Ian.B

Active Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
982
Location
Mildura, NW Victoria, Australia
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
Warning to anyone: raw+jpg can get very messy and very confusing. Well it did for me
Instead of having both files in lightroom, consider separating the files in windows into two folders>import the jpg only and only import the raw if really needed. Some may want to do it the other way round as jpg file are a guide for editing . Keep it mind that when we delete the raw file from the hard drive we also delete the jpg file even if it is not in LR. Must admit I don't know what happens when we the jpg from the HD with lightroom (?? anyone know?]

RAW + JPG: Done some testing with deleting from h/d using LR

jpg and raw in two folders
>>only the raw is deleted. [jpg is still on the h/drive

raw and jpg in one folder with jpg only in LR
>>only the jpg will be delete from the H/D [raw is still on the h/drive

raw and jpg in 2 folders in LR
>>only the highlighted photo will be deleted

raw and jpg imported and 'treated as separate photo by lightroom
>>only highlighted photo will be deleted

raw in lr and jpg in windows "treated as a same file or photo" by lightroom
>>both will be deleted from the hard drive

No idea if that helps anyone. I can understand why some use raw+jpg and very often I really only need the jpg file as long as a near "perfect" exposed photo falls out of the camera; however raw is the safest bet. Consider making a preset or several presets that edits your average raw files to be very much like an off the card jpg. Once you have that edit with the white balance and highlight clippings in check you don't have to have the raw file. Export the edited file back into LR as a large jpg file [300 dpi and something like a 8x12 or 12x18 inch]. You are then free to delete those space robbing big raw files or dng file in my case.

I know many of the "perfectionist" will not agree; however not everyone wants or needs big prefect photos from mega megabyte cameras available today. I'm more than happy with 12-16 mb files from my 2 cameras I use. And that bit of extra storage or bigger computer is not "cheap to buy" for everyone ;). Photography has become or can become a rather expensive hobby imo

Another tip for the time/storage poor: don't take SO many photos in the first place. We are all guilty of that these days when compared to the film days. It's totally ridiculous the number of nature photos I deleted from yesterday's walk. And it's totally ridiculous the time I have already spent deleted so many and the more time needed to pick the best or better files. No wonder the lappy it always complaining

Cheers;

PS : "Photography has become or can become a rather expensive hobby imo". . If that is a problem for you, I hope to be addressing such dramas on my Facebook page as some stage. That's why I took the little Lumix fz200 walk-about yesterday ;)
 
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
22,669
Location
Isle of Wight, UK
Lightroom Experience
Power User
Lightroom Version
Cloud Service
Great advice and good info on what happens under various import options. I'd like to see that outlined somewhere, in the FAQ book, here, some guide, or whatever. It is very confusing.
Just run past me which bit I need to clarify?

The short version - if Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate photos is checked, they're considered entirely different photos and treated as such, but if it's checked, the JPEGs are hidden and "attached" to the raw file so they're taken along for the ride when moving/deleting/renaming (as long as it hasn't been moved outside of LR and therefore "lost").
 

LRList001

Active Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
365
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
6.x
Just run past me which bit I need to clarify?

The short version - if Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate photos is checked, they're considered entirely different photos and treated as such, but if it's checked, the JPEGs are hidden and "attached" to the raw file so they're taken along for the ride when moving/deleting/renaming (as long as it hasn't been moved outside of LR and therefore "lost").
I've an idea there is an 'un' missing from this, the second time. So ...but if it's UNchecked, the JPEGs are hidden and "attached" to the raw file...
 
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
22,669
Location
Isle of Wight, UK
Lightroom Experience
Power User
Lightroom Version
Cloud Service
I've an idea there is an 'un' missing from this, the second time. So ...but if it's UNchecked, the JPEGs are hidden and "attached" to the raw file...
Oh well spotted, yes, that's right.
 
Top