• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Dark mode now has a single preference for the whole site! It's a simple toggle switch in the bottom right-hand corner of any page. As it uses a cookie to store your preference, you may need to dismiss the cookie banner before you can see it. Any problems, please let us know!

Guided align after rotation

Status
Not open for further replies.

jonnio

New Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
9
Lightroom Experience
Beginner
Lightroom Version
Hi, I have an issue with using the guided transform tool after rotating within the crop tool.
It seems to make sense to get my pictures level by rotating and then going to the transform section to do my guided align (buildings perspective correction etc). But using the guided align button always resets my rotation??
Am I missing something?
Thanks Jon
 
Yes, you are indeed. Because Guided Upright works on horizontal lines as well as vertical lines (you can use both in the same image), it makes sense that any rotation is reset first.
 
Also, to some degree this is a matter of perception. As a professional architectural photographer I use this tool often, and depending on the angle you were facing when you shot the image, it may not look correct if everything - particularly horizontal lines - is 90 degrees straight. Sometimes human-made structures look better when the result is not "accurate". So, one-point perspective (standing right in front) typically looks fine with everything at 90 degrees, but being off to the side even a little bit means the horizontals should not always be parallel to look OK.
 
Yes, you are indeed. Because Guided Upright works on horizontal lines as well as vertical lines (you can use both in the same image), it makes sense that any rotation is reset first.
Thanks Ill try using both and see what happens. Jon
 
Also, to some degree this is a matter of perception. As a professional architectural photographer I use this tool often, and depending on the angle you were facing when you shot the image, it may not look correct if everything - particularly horizontal lines - is 90 degrees straight. Sometimes human-made structures look better when the result is not "accurate". So, one-point perspective (standing right in front) typically looks fine with everything at 90 degrees, but being off to the side even a little bit means the horizontals should not always be parallel to look OK.
Thanks yes I see what you mean, Im rarley directly in front of the subject. I knew my camera was not level when I took the shot so I figured it best to rotate the image first and then try and correct at least some of the perspective distortion from this point onwards. The lens was at 12mm so lots of distortion.
 
Having shot with a 12 mm lens, it can be pretty tricky. The physics of light really come into play with a lens that wide, and depending on the circumstances, can be insurmountable - depending, of course, on taste. My general experience, if you're trying to come up with a "realistic" image with a super-wide lens, is it's better to be back a ways from the subject, and looking straight at it (1-point perspective). There are things you can do in Photoshop that are not available in Lightroom, however, sometimes there's only so much you can do to approach where you would like to be.
 
I have a panning clamp above the ballhead. When I level this, I can rotate the camera and the camera stays perfectly level. This means all vertical lines stay vertical. I now have to decide what lens I need to use to cover the subject. In many cases I may have to stitch several vertical shots to get my subject in the frame. My preferred focal length is 50 mm which gives me the most natural looking perspective.

I agree, in post processing, having a slight inward lean looks more natural. Lr or Ps will take a click or 2. With my capture technique above I can concentrate on post processing the tones, colours, composition, but not spend a lot of time trying to deal with the geometry. If I am forced to point the camera up or down then at least the perspective tools in Lr/Ps gives an opportunity to save the image.
 
Having shot with a 12 mm lens, it can be pretty tricky. The physics of light really come into play with a lens that wide, and depending on the circumstances, can be insurmountable - depending, of course, on taste. My general experience, if you're trying to come up with a "realistic" image with a super-wide lens, is it's better to be back a ways from the subject, and looking straight at it (1-point perspective). There are things you can do in Photoshop that are not available in Lightroom, however, sometimes there's only so much you can do to approach where you would like to be.
Thanks for your reply, yes I think using 12mm is making it a lot harder to frame any subject and expect to be able to correct everything in post perfectly. Although I have now discovered that the guided correction in lightroom can be used twice, one for verticals and then for the horizontals which seems to get good results for the "standing straight in front" pictures.
 
I have a panning clamp above the ballhead. When I level this, I can rotate the camera and the camera stays perfectly level. This means all vertical lines stay vertical. I now have to decide what lens I need to use to cover the subject. In many cases I may have to stitch several vertical shots to get my subject in the frame. My preferred focal length is 50 mm which gives me the most natural looking perspective.

I agree, in post processing, having a slight inward lean looks more natural. Lr or Ps will take a click or 2. With my capture technique above I can concentrate on post processing the tones, colours, composition, but not spend a lot of time trying to deal with the geometry. If I am forced to point the camera up or down then at least the perspective tools in Lr/Ps gives an opportunity to save the image.
Thats a good idea! Have you a link for a panning clamp? I could try it with my 40mm, thanks
 
I will post some links and snaps of my setup shortly.

Most tripod heads have the pano adjustment under the ballhead. This will only work if your tripod is perfectly level, better luck winning the lottery. As soon as you rotate the head you lose the level platform for your camera snd now verical lines are no longer verticle.

With the panning clamp on top of the ballhead , you use the flexibility of the ball head to get the camera level. Now you can rotate the camera at will and it always stays level.
 
These are quick grab shots with an iPhone.

Sorry about the size of the pics.

The first is my light travel kit. Arca Swiss P0 head, with cheap clamp and Gitzo traveller. The head is tiny, but handles a fair load. Many ingenious features. The pano head is built in and can be tightened and released with the little silver knob on the side with the min of effort. Seriously well engineered piece of kit. I had a Really Right Stuff snap clamp on this but replaced it with a cheapo screw clamp from ebay.



1530270259817.png


The second is my heavy duty kit.

1. This is a RRS pano head with large screw clamps. I was initially enamoured by RSS snap clamps, but now prefer a big screw clamp. I place my camera on the head, so the lens is over the screw, so is out of the way, yet convenient for practical use.
PC-PRO Quick-Release Clamp

2. BH40 Head
3. Gitzo Systematic Tripod

1530270509835.png


A quick search of amazon will reveal a whole world of alternative brands and options... for example this pano /clamp combo.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/SUNWAYFOTO...71171&sr=8-3-fkmr0&keywords=Andoer+pano+clamp
 
These are quick grab shots with an iPhone.

Sorry about the size of the pics.

The first is my light travel kit. Arca Swiss P0 head, with cheap clamp and Gitzo traveller. The head is tiny, but handles a fair load. Many ingenious features. The pano head is built in and can be tightened and released with the little silver knob on the side with the min of effort. Seriously well engineered piece of kit. I had a Really Right Stuff snap clamp on this but replaced it with a cheapo screw clamp from ebay.



View attachment 11117

The second is my heavy duty kit.

1. This is a RRS pano head with large screw clamps. I was initially enamoured by RSS snap clamps, but now prefer a big screw clamp. I place my camera on the head, so the lens is over the screw, so is out of the way, yet convenient for practical use.
PC-PRO Quick-Release Clamp

2. BH40 Head
3. Gitzo Systematic Tripod

View attachment 11118

A quick search of amazon will reveal a whole world of alternative brands and options... for example this pano /clamp combo.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/SUNWAYFOTO...71171&sr=8-3-fkmr0&keywords=Andoer+pano+clamp
Thank you so much for this information.
Id forgotten Id seen these before. Think Ill need a bigger tripod than the one I have to make the most of this set up.
Do you ever use the bracket for portrait shooting?
Thanks Jon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top