• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Stop struggling with Lightroom! There's no need to spend hours hunting for the answers to your Lightroom Classic questions. All the information you need is in Adobe Lightroom Classic - The Missing FAQ!

    To help you get started, there's a series of easy tutorials to guide you through a simple workflow. As you grow in confidence, the book switches to a conversational FAQ format, so you can quickly find answers to advanced questions. And better still, the eBooks are updated for every release, so it's always up to date.
  • 12 December 2024 It's Lightroom update time again! See What’s New in Lightroom Classic 14.1, Mobile & Desktop (December 2024)? for Feature updates, new cameras and lenses, and bug fixes.

Develop module Forcing correct white balance on import

mrfearless47

Member
Premium Classic Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
43
Location
Lake Oswego, OR
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version Number
14.0.1
Operating System
  1. macOS 15 Sequoia
Shooting in raw using a Nikon Z9 (or Z8). Running Lightroom 14.0.1 under Sequoia 15.1. I’ve noticed that if a precise white balance (in Kelvin) is set in camera, Lightroom rarely respects the exact setting, often off by about 200° K, even ingesting with Camera Setting (in camera set to flat) and WB set to As Shot. Example. Set WB to 6250° K in camera,LRC reports 6050 ° K. If I had wanted 6050°K, I would have set it to that. I know I can change the WB in LRC, but why do I have to?
 
Because you are shooting RAW. All of those in camera settings are for JPEGs produced by the camera processor. RAW is unprocessed as it comes from the camera. The JPEGS in the camera will have a fixed WB whereas the RAW is always adjustable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hi,

Besides the more technical answers provided above (which I don't question one second), I have a question for you as my reply: "Is the WB and tint that LRC displays similar to what you viewed in the camera or had in mind? Do the 200 K difference that LRC displays and that you selected in the camera make a noticeable difference, or are the results similar?"

I am asking because, in my view, it could be possible that LRC is adding or subtracting a few hundred Kelvin to get a result that is as close as possible to the result the combination of camera + wb selected would produce.

In other words, if WB selected in the camera produces a similar result as the same file now with LRC selected WB, it could be a deliberate correction in order to match the camera settings. If so, then I would argue that I wouldn't mind this at all.

If the end results are dramatically different, then its a different ballgame.

Jurry
 
"Is the WB and tint that LRC displays similar to what you viewed in the camera or had in mind? Do the 200 K difference that LRC displays and that you selected in the camera make a noticeable difference, or are the results similar?"
When a RAW file is demosaic'd and converted to RGB, It has no WN tone or Noise corrections. These are applied by LrC whenthe RGB file is created just to give you a reasonable image to ponder. Auto Adjustments will determine the WB based on the best white point found in the whole image. "Daylight", "Cloudy", ... , "Flash" correspond to the generally accepted ˚Kelvin values for those conditions. "As Shot" should recover the temperature setting in the file metadata. But as Johan has explained this could result in differences between the number used in the camera and derived by Adobe.
 
How about creting your own RAW profile for your camera ?
The RAW profile is used by LrC to create the image you see in the develop module before any dévelopement settings. Lightroom provide several RAW profiles, some from Adobe, some simulating the profiles of your camera (Portrait, landscape, neutral, etc). They can be found at the top of the basic panel :
1731318716070.png

By cliquing on the drop-down list, you can select "Browse" to view all the RAW Profiles :
1731319032681.png

Using DNG_Profile_Editor (found here), you can even create your own RAW profile for your camera that better correspoond to what you want.

(Remember this is not a develop preset, it is just an indication for LrC to how create the image you see in the develop module before any develop settings)
 
If you use a manual WB setting on your camera, and you want Lightroom to apply that exact same setting, then all you will have to do is create a preset with that setting and apply the preset on import. Alternatively you can add the WB setting to the preset you use as camera defaults.
 
How about creting your own RAW profile for your camera ?
The RAW profile is used by LrC to create the image you see in the develop module before any dévelopement settings. Lightroom provide several RAW profiles, some from Adobe, some simulating the profiles of your camera (Portrait, landscape, neutral, etc). They can be found at the top of the basic panel :
View attachment 24816
By cliquing on the drop-down list, you can select "Browse" to view all the RAW Profiles :
View attachment 24817
Using DNG_Profile_Editor (found here), you can even create your own RAW profile for your camera that better correspoond to what you want.

(Remember this is not a develop preset, it is just an indication for LrC to how create the image you see in the develop module before any develop settings)
That’s a great idea.
 
If you use a manual WB setting on your camera, and you want Lightroom to apply that exact same setting, then all you will have to do is create a preset with that setting and apply the preset on import. Alternatively you can add the WB setting to the preset you use as camera defaults.
I joined this forum not to long ago, but I am still amazed at the responsiveness, involvement and expertise of it’s members.

Quit unique and I am glad to be a member of this community.
 
Back
Top