• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Stop struggling with Lightroom! There's no need to spend hours hunting for the answers to your Lightroom Classic questions. All the information you need is in Adobe Lightroom Classic - The Missing FAQ!

    To help you get started, there's a series of easy tutorials to guide you through a simple workflow. As you grow in confidence, the book switches to a conversational FAQ format, so you can quickly find answers to advanced questions. And better still, the eBooks are updated for every release, so it's always up to date.
  • 14 August 2024 It's Lightroom update time again! See What’s New in Lightroom Classic 13.5, Mobile & Desktop (August 2024)? for the bug fixes. Hopefully this will fix many of the sync issues reporting in Classic 13.3 and 13.4.

best way to use Lr Classic with catalog and images ALL in the cloud

Status
Not open for further replies.

dtbain

Active Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
127
Location
Glasgow, UK
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
Lightroom Version Number
Lightroom Classic 8.3.1
Operating System
  1. macOS 10.13 High Sierra
Hello All

Any advice on the following would be hugely appreciated.

I am considering changing my Lightroom set-up so that my pics are in the cloud, but before I go to the effort and expense it would be extremely helpful to get the guidance of people on here.

Here's my current set up:

I have a Adobe Photoplan (£120 annually) that comes with both the Lr web version and Lr Classic and 20 GB cloud space. I use Classic, not the web version, and not any of the cloud space. I have two Macbook pros, the main one with HD of 1TB, the other 500GB. My master catalog, which (including pics) is just over 1TB in size, is kept on a 2TB external hard drive (ehd). When I edit, I usually don't do so directly on the ehd, but instead export various folders of pictures (yes, I keep my pictures in folders) as catalogues to my local mac drive ("Summer holiday", "Xmas holiday", etc), then edit them for a week or two, and then import those cats back into the master on the ehd. (I do this mainly so I don't have to be connected to an ehd, not because of speed. Editing on the ehd is fast enough, I've found, but fear the cable falling out, not to mention not wanting the cable when editing on the move.) I use chronosync to back up that master ehd to a second 2TB ehd, reasonably often, which I keep offsite. Finally, my wife occasionally edits pictures in Lr too, or makes photo books, on my second macbook pro, working on the same pictures, occasionally at the same time as me, in which case she exports a folder to catalog on that macbook's drive and then reimports, as I do. So that we both have the same presets etc. available, I've moved the Lr settings to a shared dropbox folder, to which there is a symbolic link in the Lr folder on each of the macbooks.​

The above (set up after consulting people on here) works pretty well, except:
(i) I am beginning to find, the busier I get, that backing up is a bit of a pain. I need to get the second ehd from my office, bring it home, do the bup, and take it back. Not a huge deal, but a bit of a pain.​
(ii) I worry that, even when I back up often (I lost some edits when I forgot to back up for a couple of months) a backup might fail when needed, or turn out to be incomplete, etc.​
(iii) The exporting of folders to cats on my local disk and then reintegrating them to the master catalog is also a bit of a pain. Sometimes, one or two pictures unaccountably don't get reimported, for instance. I have always been able to fix this when it happens, but it takes time and is a clunky process.​

Hence I've been considering moving to a set up that keeps my pictures and master cat in the cloud. That seems to be the way the world is going and my hope is that if this works ...

a. I won't need to do anything by way of backing up; the system will take care of this in the background (like dropbox or time machine), and the back ups that the system makes will be fully reliable, perhaps even archived such that I can revert to a back up other than the most recent if there is something wrong with the most recent. (See (i) and (ii) above.)​
b. There will be no need for either my wife or me to export folders to cats on our local drives, at least not unless we're going to edit simultaneously, which would perhaps be a circumstance in which that will still make sense? (See (iii) above.)​
c. I can continue to use Lr Classic, assuming I am right that this version remains more fully featured than the cloud version and also more user friendly at least for those of us who learnt Lr using it.​
d. My wife and I can continue to edit my pictures on my two macbooks, using the same settings, ideally, perhaps sometimes simultaneously (which as I say might require snapping off catalogs and then re-importing).​
So the question is whether this can be achieved and if so how best to do it. I take it there are really two options (please do say if there are others).

A. Pay Adobe for more cloud space on my Photoplan to 2TB, which would push the price from £120 to £360.​
B. Somehow try to use Dropbox to the same effect, for which I already pay for 2TB storage (hence no extra cost), and which now includes smart syncs. This would save me the £240 extra involved in plan 1.​

Finally, then (sorry about the long explanation), can I ask:

1. Will option A give me everything I want, i.e. reliable, effortless back ups, and the ability to edit in Classic (using the same settings) on two macbooks without having to export parts of the master catalog and re-importing them? Not having used it, I am not 100% clear about how the cloud storage works with Lr. Is it (as with Dropbox's smart sync, I take it) that it will look on my mac as though all my pictures are on my mac, but actually they are all virtual copies, the full fat versions being in the cloud, and editing works by (for instance) choosing a folder to produce the full fat versions on the mac, for editing, before returning them to the cloud once finished? (I don' use smart previews by the way, since my instinct has always been to work with the full fat image, but perhaps that's stupid; do say if that's relevant here!) Also, so that I don't further waste your time, is there somewhere on the web (perhaps indeed on Victoria's site?!) where I can get a clear description of how the workflow would go for using Lightroom classic and having all one's pics and one's cat in the cloud?

2. Is option B feasible? It's certainly cheaper, which is attractive, but if it's inconvenient or unsafe I would avoid it, since what I am trying to do is maximise convenience and safety. I take the rough shape of this option is that I would keep my cat and pictures in the dropbox cloud, with only virtual copies on my machine, but -- unlike 1 -- I would go outside of Lr (i.e. to dropbox) to choose a folder to make it real (rather than just virtual) on my hard drive, so that I can edit what's in that folder, before later restoring those pictures to the cloud, leaving only virtual copies on my mac's hard drive. Is that right? Is that sensible? Would it achieve what I want? And, as before, does anyone know of someone who does this who might have written up a brief but clear account of the work flow? (At least one problem with the dropbox option is that I think I would, at least temporarily, need to get all my pics onto my mac's HD -- since that is where my dropbox folder lives -- in order for them to be uploaded to the cloud, but I don't have room for that on my mac hard drive.)

Thanks everyone. I've had such excellent advice from this forum in the past that I really didn't want to take this (for me) big step without consulting, but I am very sorry for the length of this -- thanks to all who made it to the end!

Any guidance *hugely* appreciated.

All best

David
PS. If the Lr cloud is also a good way of sharing pictures with friends and family, then that would mean I could stop using smugmug, hence saving some money that way, but I don't think that is its real purpose?
 
Dear all

Sorry for the long essay. When I write tired, I go on a bit! Here in brief are my real two questions:

1. What is the best thing for me to read to get an idea of how keeping my pics in the Adobe cloud (i.e. with the Photo Plan + 2TB storage) works, e.g. whether it would make unnecessary any manual backups or any exporting of sub-catalogs for local storage during editing and allow me (and my wife) to use Lr on both my macbooks.

2. Does Dropbox, in which I have 2TB storage and smart syncing (I think it's called), provided a comparable alternative, and what might I read to find out more about how that would work?

Thanks all

David
 
As an answer to your PS "If the Lr cloud is also a good way of sharing pictures with friends and family, then that would mean I could stop using smugmug, hence saving some money that way, but I don't think that is its real purpose? ".
I'm in the same situation as a SmugMug pro and LR TB Cloud user and have considered giving up my SM pro subscription. Although I do occasionally share a Lightroom Album for a short period of time with family and friends because it's easy to send a link, as a gallery and sharing interface SM is much better thought through (although still far from perfect) in terms of display, options, tree structure, security refinements, customization possibilities, etc.
LR Web is still VERY rudimentary when it comes to sharing and folder structure. And yes one could create a Portfolio web site and link your LR galleries in possibly another structure with other sharing possibilities, but after considerable experimentation my impression of Portfolio is "pretty but dumb". That is, attractive and user friendly but with extremely limited metadata display capabilities.
Just my 2 cents.
 
As a non-pro user, I find the album sharing capabilities of the Adobe cloud to be usually more that adequate. Yes, there are still some limitations, but it continues to develop and it reached the point quite a while ago where I gave up my Flickr/Google/Dropbox accounts and now share only via LrCloud. By far the biggest advantage from my perspective is that as well as giving up the other accounts I've also given up the mundane tasks of large exports and published services... the viewer always sees the latest edited version with zero effort on my part. I can (and indeed have), interactively edit an image at a viewers request and the viewer sees the change usually within seconds of it being made.

To the original questions: David, it's not totally clear to me what your main focus is. If all you want is to have a cloud backup of your Classic image library, there are cheaper ways of doing that without using the Adobe Cloud. Dropbox, obviously, is one way but there are plenty of others.

However, the main advantage (to me at least) of the LrCloud is not the backup capability (that's of limited interest to me as I have plenty of other ways to backup my data), instead it's the "view and share all your images wherever you are, using whatever device you have with you". Currently I have that access on 2 desktop systems, 2 x iPads, 2 x smartphones plus of course virtually any browser on any computer. All seeing the current edited state of all my image library with hardly any effort on my part. If that's your interest, then only the LrCloud will give you that if your base point is a Lightroom Classic catalog, you cannot achieve that using Dropbox without going through the process of exporting/publishing your entire image library and redoing that for each image you subsequently add or change.
 
Thanks Jim, that's very helpful.

And thanks for pressing me on my central motivation. It really isn't album-sharing (though I did mention that, and what you say sounds good). The real advantages I am seeking are the following, in order of priority:

1. To make my backup procedures more reliable and less time-consuming. (Currently, I have my master cat one ehd, which I use chronosync to backup to other ehds.)

2. To have a set up such that, despite my master cat being bigger than my mac's hard drive (>1TB vs 1TB), I can edit Lr pictures on my mac without having to EITHER "snap" catalogs off (i.e. export folders to my mac drive from the ehd and then re-import them when done) OR having to have my master ehd connected to my mac when editing.

I was thinking (not sure I am right) that Adobe cloud would deliver both advantages. I take it 1 is straightforward. Regarding 2, I take it that I could download full res versions of images during editing on my mac, and then return them to the Lr cloud. Is that correct?

Regarding dropbox, which is certainly cheaper (not least since I have dropbox already), I am not clear how well it would work and how reliable it would be, and this is one of the reasons I for my OP. In particular ...

Regarding 1, dropbox should be able to do this, I take it, but since dropbox syncs to my mac drive, which is smaller than my cat+images, I am not sure how to get my cat+images into the dropbox cloud in the first place. (Once it's there, I think the mismatch in size would be ok, since I have smart sync, allowing me to only have virtual copies -- or whatever dropbox calls them -- of the images on my mac unless and until needed.) Any advice here would be very welcome.

Regarding 2, I was thinking that I could download a given folder to my mac, edit it in Lr on my mac, then return it the dropbox cloud. I guess one big problem with this is that dropbox will sync during the editing process, which might slow things down? Again, any thoughts here would be welcome.

Even if dropbox only delivered benefit 1, it might be worth going with it over Lr cloud just given the saving (about £240 annually).

Any advice, or pointing in the direction of people who use Lr with dropbox, would be great.

Thanks again

David
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top