I was looking to make some B+W presents butnotice that 'greyscale ' is the starting point and thinking about the greyscale in CS3 wonder whether this isn't an inferior way of making B+W
(not suggesting it is as Iknow nothing about it - just wondering)
I know we can make lots of adjustments in LR greyscale whereas in CS3 it is not the same, but do you get as good end result in LR as in CS? i'e which is the more/less destructive (assuming use of adjustment layers i CS3) and which gives more control, without pixel level adjusting (masks etc.)
e.g. in CS3 I tend to use levels/curves first, then the channel mixer, then the hue saturation, to get some pretty exact results.
-I know I can make an action but is that as useful as or better than preset?
i.e. whhat are the pros and cons of B+W in LR v CS3?
EDIT: is this in the right forum? (mod move if not?-thanks)
(not suggesting it is as Iknow nothing about it - just wondering)
I know we can make lots of adjustments in LR greyscale whereas in CS3 it is not the same, but do you get as good end result in LR as in CS? i'e which is the more/less destructive (assuming use of adjustment layers i CS3) and which gives more control, without pixel level adjusting (masks etc.)
e.g. in CS3 I tend to use levels/curves first, then the channel mixer, then the hue saturation, to get some pretty exact results.
-I know I can make an action but is that as useful as or better than preset?
i.e. whhat are the pros and cons of B+W in LR v CS3?
EDIT: is this in the right forum? (mod move if not?-thanks)