• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Stop struggling with Lightroom! There's no need to spend hours hunting for the answers to your Lightroom Classic questions. All the information you need is in Adobe Lightroom Classic - The Missing FAQ!

    To help you get started, there's a series of easy tutorials to guide you through a simple workflow. As you grow in confidence, the book switches to a conversational FAQ format, so you can quickly find answers to advanced questions. And better still, the eBooks are updated for every release, so it's always up to date.

Another Windows Mystery

Status
Not open for further replies.

Paul_DS256

Senior Member
Premium Classic Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
1,218
Lightroom Experience
Intermediate
Lightroom Version
Classic
Lightroom Version Number
LrC 10.3
Operating System
  1. Windows 10
I'm planning around with the new Super Resolution in 10.3. I just blew up a 6000x4000 NEF file to a 12000x8000 DNG. The original NEF was 27MB. The DNG is 370MB. All ok.

Microsoft reports my NEF as being an image of 6000x4000. It says the DNG is 1024x683. Weird.

Looking at the EXIF Data for the DNG, I find 3 sub-types under SubIFD
  • Full-resolution Image; 6016x4014
  • Enhanced image data; 12032x8032
  • Reduced-resolution image;1024x683. This seems to be what Windows is reporting.
Wondering why Windows is getting confused or if it's just reporting the last SubIFD it finds.

Thoughts?
 
A clue. The sub-type of "Reduced-resolution image;1024x683." has a tag for "PreviewApplicationName =Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic". The other sub-types don't have a PreviewApplicationName.
 
I'm planning around with the new Super Resolution in 10.3. I just blew up a 6000x4000 NEF file to a 12000x8000 DNG. The original NEF was 27MB. The DNG is 370MB. All ok.

Microsoft reports my NEF as being an image of 6000x4000. It says the DNG is 1024x683. Weird.

Looking at the EXIF Data for the DNG, I find 3 sub-types under SubIFD
  • Full-resolution Image; 6016x4014
  • Enhanced image data; 12032x8032
  • Reduced-resolution image;1024x683. This seems to be what Windows is reporting.
Wondering why Windows is getting confused or if it's just reporting the last SubIFD it finds.

Thoughts?
Do you normally convert NEFs to DNGs? If not, do a few conversions and then repeat the EXIFData review for both the NEFs and the DNGs.

Out of curiosity, do you Super Resolution DNGs also contain the original NEFs?
 
The original data is , indeed, held in the DNG file (so it can be used again in future if needed). This is part of the reson other software is confused on the sizing of the file.

Check your Classic books, 2nd Edition, Appendix F6 for further details.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top