MarathonMax
Member
I have recently migrated from Aperture to LR3.
Although I have totally in love with LR; I can even say that I prefer its UI although most people, including LR users, often say that AP has the upper hand here.
One thing I miss is the ease of synchronizing albums to the iPad.
In AP, under a project, I would do a "best of" smart album with 4-5 stars rating and would sync that album using iTunes. Simple.
I create a smart publishing service. this is fairly similar to AP, although "detached" from the project structure - which is a minus for LR.
Then it gets complicated.
Because for each "album" that I want, I must recreate a new publishing service. With each one, I must select the destination folder (which is always /<user>/images/ipad/<album>), the file names, the file size, and other stuff.
I wish that I could simply setup one hard disk pub service named "iPad" and in there add smart albums that would save themselves in separate sub folders.
Or am I getting this wrong?
Max
Although I have totally in love with LR; I can even say that I prefer its UI although most people, including LR users, often say that AP has the upper hand here.
One thing I miss is the ease of synchronizing albums to the iPad.
In AP, under a project, I would do a "best of" smart album with 4-5 stars rating and would sync that album using iTunes. Simple.
I create a smart publishing service. this is fairly similar to AP, although "detached" from the project structure - which is a minus for LR.
Then it gets complicated.
Because for each "album" that I want, I must recreate a new publishing service. With each one, I must select the destination folder (which is always /<user>/images/ipad/<album>), the file names, the file size, and other stuff.
I wish that I could simply setup one hard disk pub service named "iPad" and in there add smart albums that would save themselves in separate sub folders.
Or am I getting this wrong?
Max