• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Stop struggling with Lightroom! There's no need to spend hours hunting for the answers to your Lightroom Classic questions. All the information you need is in Adobe Lightroom Classic - The Missing FAQ!

    To help you get started, there's a series of easy tutorials to guide you through a simple workflow. As you grow in confidence, the book switches to a conversational FAQ format, so you can quickly find answers to advanced questions. And better still, the eBooks are updated for every release, so it's always up to date.

Upsizing Capability of LR Classic vs Photoshop

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jimmsp

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
1,303
Location
Green Valley, Arizona, USA
Lightroom Experience
Advanced
Lightroom Version
Classic
Lightroom Version Number
latest
Operating System
  1. Windows 10
Has anyone done a semi-quantitative comparison of the upsizing capability of the latest LR Classic and the latest Photoshop?
Say I had a photo that was 1000 px on a side and I wanted to upsize it to 1500 px a side.
Has anyone found a difference?

In general, I upsize in PS, and I do that before I do some other work there. I am generally working on a tiff I sent over from LR. I have found that PS tends to better in a lot of things than does LR, though it is generally more work.
In the situation I am facing, I will work with a jpeg.
 
Has anyone done a semi-quantitative comparison of the upsizing capability of the latest LR Classic and the latest Photoshop?
Say I had a photo that was 1000 px on a side and I wanted to upsize it to 1500 px a side.
Has anyone found a difference?

In general, I upsize in PS, and I do that before I do some other work there. I am generally working on a tiff I sent over from LR. I have found that PS tends to better in a lot of things than does LR, though it is generally more work.
In the situation I am facing, I will work with a jpeg.
I will also want to compare the 2x upsize, from 1000 to 2000 px.
I am guessing that is where I will see the difference.
 
Long ago, and for practical purposes it wasn't worth going to PS.

You know you can compare the two images in PS by getting them onto layers and using Difference blending mode?
 
Long ago, and for practical purposes it wasn't worth going to PS.

You know you can compare the two images in PS by getting them onto layers and using Difference blending mode?
Thanks. I have had good luck with both. I have been playing with more texture blending, and many of my textures need upsizing. That is easy to do in PS. The case in hand is for upsizing a smaller photo for a photo club member for a contest I run so that she can compete on equal ground. As you say, practically it may not make a difference, but PS gives a fair amount of control, and LR is "just an export" and I have never read about what algorism it uses. I was planning on using the PS difference mode, then looking in any specific areas at higher mag.
In general with a lot of pixels in my RAWS, I use LR to downsize for multiple uses, though I upsize for some printing and have never given it a 2nd thought. I asked here as my analytical side kicked in before I do it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top