• Welcome to the Lightroom Queen Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to post your first thread under Help at the bottom of the page. You're also welcome to download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBooks and explore our other FAQ resources.
  • Stop struggling with Lightroom! There's no need to spend hours hunting for the answers to your Lightroom Classic questions. All the information you need is in Adobe Lightroom Classic - The Missing FAQ!

    To help you get started, there's a series of easy tutorials to guide you through a simple workflow. As you grow in confidence, the book switches to a conversational FAQ format, so you can quickly find answers to advanced questions. And better still, the eBooks are updated for every release, so it's always up to date.

Does Lr Place More Demands on Processor or Memory?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nicky3540

Member
Premium Classic Member
Joined
May 6, 2017
Messages
59
Lightroom Experience
Advanced
Lightroom Version
Classic
Lightroom Version Number
Lightroom Classic 9.0
Operating System
  1. macOS 10.15 Catalina
My iMac is six-plus years old and for various reasons I decided to upgrade to a new one. I bought one with a 3.0GHz 6-core 8th-generation Intel Core i5 processor and upgraded the memory to 32GB. (I also chose to get SSD storage instead of a hard drive or a Fusion drive.)

I've already ordered the computer in that configuration, so I'm not looking for buying advice, but I'm curious: Is processor speed or memory capacity more important for accelerating Lr (and some Photoshop) performance? I imagine it's some of both, but for future reference, and if you have a limited budget, do you get more bang for your buck by going with a faster processor or more RAM? I'll be running the latest versions of Lr and Photoshop on Catalina.
 
The short answer is BOTH.
Lightroom Classic will use up to 6 CPU cores and commandeer the GPU for additional number crunching when appropriate.
I have found that Lightroom performance becomes a non issue when there is at least 16GB of RAM and even better with 32GB I have not seen anyone post/boast with more than 32GB of RAM.
I hope that you opted for the 1TB SSD. 256GB SSD is IMO inadequate and 512GB SSD is marginally sufficient.
 
Yes, I did get the 1TB SSD. I plan to keep this iMac for six or more years like I did the previous one, and all the advice I read said that if you plan to do that, you should go for the upgrades offered on the processor, memory and storage.
 
The short answer is BOTH.

I hope that you opted for the 1TB SSD. 256GB SSD is IMO inadequate and 512GB SSD is marginally sufficient.
Speaking only as a Windows 10 user, I find that at 5412 GB SSD is adequate for Windows + programs, and "most" data. That data includes the usual email, spreadsheets, etc. plus the Lightroom catalog. I use separate large HDDs for books, photo, video and music storage.

I have read that the latest generation of SSDs gets better performance for 1 TB and larger, compared with the entry-level 512 GB version.

Phil
 
I got mine about 6 weeks ago. Doing some research for budgeting people suggested in this order. You should first get the best processor, then the most memory, and finally the best gpu. I got the basic 8GB of RAM and then purchased another 32GB which I installed myself. I'm going to order another 32 this month .These are my current specs with a 500GB SSD and it flies.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-11-10 at 8.34.09 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-11-10 at 8.34.09 AM.png
    46.1 KB · Views: 259
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top